Tag Archives: Andy Schleck

The Tour de France, the selectiveness of French fans and the dangers of meat

1 Jul

Alberto Contador is having a tough time these days. Not only is he under a cloud of suspicion following a positive doping test at last year’s Tour, he was also jeered by the fans (predominantly French) under the pre-Tour presentation, and now comes the news that he has found it impossible to eat meat since that much-debated test result as well. He ate his last steak on that fateful evening when the disputed Clenbuterol allegedly entered his blood stream, and hasn’t touched any since.

Now this might just be a way of saying ‘see how much I really do blame that blasted piece of meat’, but if he really wants to endear himself to the French fans – and he could do with a bit of that – then forsaking the country’s beloved boeuf is surely not the best way forward. I don’t think his culinary habits will have much sway over WADA or the UCI either, somehow.

Anyhow, the greatest show on sporting earth starts tomorrow. Are you ready? Here’s hoping Andy Schleck is up for the battle!

Does leaving Saxo Bank have to involve unprofessional behaviour?

20 Sep

First Andy Schleck and Stuart O’Grady are thrown out of the Vuelta, thus providing an ill-tempered ending their Saxo Bank careers, in an alcohol-induced fog (the size of which is still disputed – two beers and an early’ish night, or a late, boozy session on town?), then Fabian Cancellara follows suit by simply climbing off his bike and heading off to the airport without further ado or further comment. He will now be leaving Saxo Bank too, despite the sizeable fee apparently required to buy him out of his contract.

That communication and good relations broke down in Saxo Bank some time ago is nothing new, so it is perhaps not that surprising that the end is turning out to be acrimonious for some of the riders, but I’m still staggered by the lack of professionalism, if these reports are to be believed. These riders didn’t just have a responsibility towards Saxo Bank and Bjarne Riis, after all, but also to their team mates. All three are still under contract, and no matter how near the end might be, they should honour their obligations and act accordingly.

It also puts me in mind of Schleck and Contador’s incident in the Tour de France, in which Contador was lambasted for not playing the gentleman and waiting when Schleck’s chain fell off. Schleck’s Vuelta episode was off the bike rather than on it, and in breach of team orders rather than the moral code of the road, but it still speaks of lack of respect. Regardless of intentions, alcohol quantity and eventual bed-time, it was an unprofessional and selfish thing to do. We’d have been unsurprised had he been a footballer, perhaps, but most people expect better from cyclists.

What I would like to know is what Frank Schleck thinks of all this. All the above were his helpers in the race, in which he eventually finished 5th, 4’43” behind winner Vincenzo Nibali. His relationship with brother Andy is famously close, and his comments about the incident were magnanimous enough, but a climber of Andy’s abilities would have been rather handy to have around, you’d have thought.

Cancellara is a different issue, and it’s not yet clear whether he will follow the Schlecks to the new Luxembourg team, or somewhere else, perhaps BMC Racing. His abrupt departure came as a surprise to Riis and Bradley McGee, Saxo Bank’s Director Sportif, with whom he’d had an altogether different agreement.

Cancellara took a surprising third during the time trial in the Vuelta, and his exit might be motivated by a desire to be fit for the World Championships, which he’s said he will only participate in if he feels fit, as he has ‘a status I need to honour’. I take that to mean he is only interested in riding if he can win, which sounds a wee bit cowardly.

All in all, I’d say none of these riders came out of the Vuelta with much dignity.

Should Contador have waited?

20 Jul

The yellow jersey of the Tour de France changed hands in controversial fashion yesterday, when Alberto Contador took advantage of Andy Schleck’s mechanical problems to gain 39 seconds on his opponent. But did he do the right thing? Should he have waited for Schleck?

Should is a difficult word. It suggests there is a correct answer, a definitive black and white solution. The rules that govern this are entirely unwritten, and purely a moral question, tempered by endless if’s and buts, and the opinions in the peloton seem split.

On the one hand, taking advantage of an opponent’s misfortune is not in the spirit of this ultimately gentlemanly sport, and Contador could not have failed to have seen Schleck’s problem, seeing as he was behind him at the time (his team would surely have radioed the news, even if that weren’t so). On the other hand, it is a race, and they were in midst of attacking when it happened. There is also an argument for saying that Schleck had used up his quota of goodwill from the unwritten rulebook back on stage 2, when Cancellara held back the entire peloton for his benefit.

There are plenty of previous examples, and it’s impossible to have this debate without mentioning Lance Armstrong and Jan Ullrich, who set the benchmark in gentlemanly conduct on the slopes, first in 2001, when Armstrong waited for Ullrich, and then in 2003, when Ullrich returned the favour (albeit prompted to do so by Tyler Hamilton, Armstrong’s former team-mate). Armstrong was sitting on the fence when asked about the incident yesterday, having not seen it, but people will still look to the example he set when judging Contador’s conduct.

But let’s step off the bike and the mountainside for a moment, and see this from the fans’ point of view. Fans want champions and heroes. Champions win because they are best, indisputably so, and heroes do it with grace, humility, sportsmanship and ideally a bit of adversity too. The fans made it quite clear that Contador had failed to live up to either when he was booed on the podium, and PR and marketing executives will share the fans’ view (they are the ones they sell to, after all).

That Contador subsequently apologised suggests that he realised the ramifications of his actions in that department. What he gained in time was lost in respect and admiration.

Ultimately, Contador made the choice of how he will be remembered. Certainly, it was fully within his rights to go, but that he chose to leave Schleck behind says to me that he wasn’t confident of beating his young opponent, and any victory he now gains will be tainted by that ‘what if’.

One will hope, for his sake, that he now goes on to win it by considerably more than the 39 seconds he gained yesterday.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.